Kurt Gödel's incompleteness theorem in essence states:
1. If the system is consistent, it cannot be complete.
2. The consistency of the axioms cannot be proven within the system.
or in other words: It is possible to have a true statement (mathematically) not only without proof, but by its very nature unable to be proven. Now, most mathematicians will shudder at the next few lines; and I do not intend to convolve this theorem with some misguided attempt to "prove" ETIs, UAPs, UFOs exist; rather, I would like to offer the following more as a thinking point, an intellectual nugget to ponder. If these phenomenon are dimensional in nature, as some would contend: how could their existence(or lack there of) be proven without a complete dimensional model? It would seem this argument alone necessitates an agnostic approach to all UAP/UFO phenomenon; as to dismiss these events out of hand, would seem premature and counter logical.
I will not draw this post out, as there are "things" afoot! Hopefully, by next week I will have some things of import to discuss.
No comments:
Post a Comment